Cryptocurrency in British Columbia: Regulatory Landscape and Legal Precedents(2025)

The cryptocurrency sector in British Columbia (BC) has undergone significant regulatory

and legal developments in recent years, particularly in the context of crypto mining and

business operations. This blog provides an overview of the current landscape, drawing

on recent legislative changes, government policy, and key court decisions.

The Regulatory Shift: BC’s Permanent Ban on New Crypto Mining Projects

In October 2025, the BC government enacted the Energy Statutes Amendment Act

(Bill 31), which permanently prohibits new cryptocurrency mining projects from

connecting to the provincial power grid. This move builds on a temporary

moratorium introduced in December 2022 and extended in 2024, reflecting the

province’s commitment to prioritizing clean energy and managing electricity demand.

The rationale behind this legislation is twofold:

 Environmental Concerns: Crypto mining is energy-intensive, and BC aims to

preserve its clean hydroelectric resources for industries with broader economic

benefits.

 Grid Management: The province seeks to avoid overburdening the electricity

grid, ensuring reliable supply for priority sectors such as mining (non-crypto),

LNG, and renewable energy projects (BC Government News Release, 2025).

Existing mining operations may continue but are not permitted to expand their grid

usage, making BC a less attractive jurisdiction for new crypto mining investments.

Legal Precedents: The Conifex Timber Litigation

The regulatory authority for these measures was tested in the courts in the Conifex

Timber Inc. v. British Columbia (Lieutenant Governor in Council) litigation. The BC

Supreme Court and the BC Court of Appeal upheld the province’s authority to direct the

BC Utilities Commission to pause or restrict service to new or pending crypto mining

operations.

Key legal findings include:

 Legislative Authority: The Lieutenant Governor in Council (LGIC) has broad

powers under the Utilities Commission Act to issue directions to the BCUC,

provided such directions align with the statute’s purposes.

 No Undue Discrimination: The courts found that crypto mining operations have

unique electricity consumption characteristics—high, constant demand—which

justifies differential treatment compared to other industrial customers.

 Policy Justification: The pause and subsequent ban were deemed reasonable

responses to economic and grid management concerns.

These decisions provide a strong legal foundation for BC’s ongoing regulatory approach

to cryptocurrency mining.

Business Operations and Fraudulent Conveyance

Beyond mining, BC courts have also addressed business arrangements in the crypto

sector. In IE CA 3 Holdings Ltd. v. NYDIG ABL LLC, 2024 BCCA 244 , the court

considered whether certain inter-company transactions in the crypto industry constituted

fraudulent conveyances under the Fraudulent Conveyance Act. The court held that

where business models and risks are fully disclosed to sophisticated lenders, and there

is no intent to defeat creditors, such transactions will not be voided as fraudulent.

Taxation and Compliance

While the focus of recent regulatory action has been on mining, crypto holders and

businesses in BC must also navigate provincial tax obligations. Resources such

as  CoinLedger’s 2025 tax guide  provide up-to-date information on how BC’s tax

brackets apply to crypto income and capital gains.

Conclusion

British Columbia’s approach to cryptocurrency regulation in 2025 is characterized by a

strong emphasis on environmental stewardship, grid management, and legal clarity. The

permanent ban on new crypto mining projects, upheld by the courts, signals a clear

policy direction. Meanwhile, BC remains a jurisdiction where transparent business

practices and compliance with disclosure obligations are essential for crypto

enterprises.

For those operating or advising in the BC crypto space, staying informed about evolving

regulations and legal precedents is crucial. As the sector matures, further developments

in both policy and case law are likely to shape the future of cryptocurrency in the

province.

Shahid Hanif

Next
Next

Presumption of Innocence: A Cornerstone of Justice